< < <
Date Index > > > |
what is to be dun by George Snedeker 11 April 2002 21:19 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
I think that a U.N. force would be better, but unlikely. a U.S/NATO force looks too much like the real colonialist doing the job. we would need to have an agreement first from Israel to withdraw from the occupied territories and allow a Palestinian State. such a State would need real economic development or it would just be a Bantustan. and yes, Israel needs some guarantees of its security. of course, nun of this is about too happen. colonialists do not just give up their claims to land and other natural resources. this case is even worse than South Africa. I am not sure that the Israelis need Palestinian labor as the white South Africans need cheap African labor. the real issue here is land and water. ----- Original Message ----- From: < kjkhoo@pop.jaring.my> To: < wsn@csf.colorado.edu> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:48 PM Subject: Re: Change in US policy towards ME:Washington Post > I suppose this is off-topic for WSN, but as a matter of curiosity, > what would be the reaction of people on this list to a > US/NATO-based/led force in Israel/Palestine concommitant with some > kind of US-'brokered' negotiations based on the Saudi/Taba proposals? > > This appears to have come up more and more regularly over the past week... > > A comment on the report: Someone might inform Dawn that there really > is no need for that "Even Jewish groups like Tikkun..." > > > At 4:59 PM +0500 11/4/02, Saima Alvi wrote: > >DAWN INTERNET EDITION (dawn.com) > > > >11 April 2002 Thursday > > > >Powell meets Arafat on Saturday: Change in policy > >================================================= > [snipped] >
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |