< < <
Date Index > > > |
US slow in fulfilling its promises towards Pakistan: NEW YORK TIMES by Saima Alvi 06 April 2002 12:46 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
DAWN INTERNET EDITION (dawn.com) 03 April 2002 Wednesday NEW YORK, April 2: Few countries have done as much for Washington in war against terrorism as Pakistan but the Bush administration has been slow to deliver on its promises. In an analysis the New York Times points out that the Pakistani government has demonstrated how firmly it is in the camp of cooperation, most lately in allowing the FBI and CIA to conduct a raid with Pakistani police here last week that rounded up more than 30 men with suspected links to Al Qaeda. The raid also demonstrated how valuable that cooperation can be: one of those apprehended, Abu Zubaydah, is suspected of being a top lieutenant of Osama bin Laden. Noting that the Bush administration has recognized the contributions of Gen Musharraf, inviting him to Washington and commending his courage, however, the paper said it has been slow to deliver on promises of police assistance, and has not removed duties and quotas on Pakistani textiles, a move that would give a vital lift to the economy of this impoverished country. "Without some tangible benefits like those, there is a question of how long the Musharraf government can continue to mobilize public opinion behind its anti-terrorism policies," the paper said. Washington has also at times taken actions that seem to undercut Gen Musharraf. Ten days ago, for example, it ordered all dependents of embassy employees to leave the country, out of concerns about security. "This is certainly not a good sign," the interior minister, Moinuddin Haider told the paper. "If everybody starts packing up and going home, it doesn't make a very good impression," he added. "We have to show some courage." That Gen Musharraf has survived this close alliance is a lesson that Washington hopes other leaders can learn, particularly President Megawati in Indonesia. Most recently, there has been a noticeable absence of protest in Pakistan over the role of agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the raid. No major newspapers have editorialized against it, and Gen Musharraf's mainstream political opponents have not criticized it. The paper said that there is certainly a radical element opposed to Gen Musharraf's policies. It is loud and violent and it has allies among Pakistan's military and intelligence corps. But for the moment the key military officers have stayed in line, and the Islamic political parties and radical leaders have failed to turn out anything but paltry crowds for anti-Musharraf or anti-American rallies. This is not to deny the existence of a deep current of anti- Americanism in this Muslim country of 140 million. The hostile sentiment arises not only because of America's policy in Israel, but much closer to home because of American policies in the region. After the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, the United States arrived in force, training, arming and equipping guerrilla groups, including the Mujahideen. When that war was over, the United States basically abandoned the region, the paper said. "Pakistan was left with drugs and Kalashnikov," a western diplomat told the paper. "Pakistan felt betrayed." The Times said: "In now siding with the United States, Gen Musharraf and his advisers have not erased this resentment, but in the main, Pakistanis appear to put national interest over past grudges. Religious extremism and sectarian violence have rent this nation. "We have taken a very strong stand, because we believe that to have security in Pakistan we cannot have extremism here," said Haider, the interior minister. It is not a risk-free policy, as Haider knows personally. His older brother was assassinated in Karachi last December. That attack was widely seen here as a retaliation against the government's policy of siding with the United States and cracking down on extremist groups in Pakistan. But the government vows to carry on. "Our resolve to continue this policy remains firm and strong, because it is good for Pakistan," Haider told the paper. Still, he would like to see a little more cooperation from the United States. The Musharraf government has given Washington a list of what it needs for its war against terrorists, starting with simple things like computers and printers for the provincial police, who are in the front line, the paper said. -- Saima Alvi Research Assistant Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS) Opposite Sector U, DHA, Lahore-54792 Tel.: 5722670-79; Ext.: 2165
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |