< < <
Date Index > > > |
Adam Smith vs. George W. Bush Jr by Threehegemons 19 February 2002 20:45 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
Rereading The Long Twentieth Century, I was struck by a quotation from Adam Smith. Smith notes the deleterious effects of European Imperialism on non-Western parts of the world: "To the natives.. all the commercial benefits which can have resulted from these events (the creation of a world market) have been sunk and lost in the dreadful misfortunes which they have occasioned." Arrighi emphasizes that Smith was aware that the key element in this process was the 'superiority of force' possessed by the Europeans at the time of expansion. However, I was more struck by the next sentence: "hereafter, perhaps, the natives of those countries may grow stronger, or those of Europe may grow weaker, and the inhabitants of all the different quarters of the world may arrive at that equality of courage and force which, by inspiring mutual fear, can alone overawe the injustice of independent nations into some sort of respect for the rights of one another." In other words, in contrast to both Bush and liberal Western peace and human rights advocates, Smith argues that it is necessary for non-Western nations to possess the means to 'inspire mutual fear' in order to lay the foundations for an equal and just world order. I wonder what he would say about the efforts to eliminate the 'axis of evil's' capacity to produce weapons of mass destruction? Steven Sherman
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |