< < <
Date Index > > > |
FW: [PEN-L:19439] Multilateralist Japan by Sabri Oncu 09 November 2001 03:06 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
[NYTimes] November 9, 2001 WORLD TRADE Japan: Ready for W.T.O. Talks, and Ready to Deal By JAMES BROOKE TOKYO, Nov. 8 - As trade ministers converge on Doha, Qatar, for a World Trade Organization meeting that begins on Friday, Japan, long the world's staunchest multilateralist, is quietly hedging its bets, pursuing a parallel policy of negotiating bilateral free trade agreements. Frustrated by the glacial pace of group talks, fearing a rising China and hoping to tailor deals to protect its antique agricultural sector, Japan is talking one on one with its major trading partners. After disdaining bilateralism and regionalism in the 1990's, Japan now faces trading blocs in North America, South America and Europe. Just this week, China announced that it had agreed to negotiations aimed at forming in 10 years the world's most populous trading bloc: 1.3 billion Chinese, plus the 500 million inhabitants of 10 Southeast Asian countries. At the same time, Japan's exports are shrinking and its once- vaunted trade surplus is melting like butter. For the first half of this fiscal year, from April through September, Japan's trade surplus was 43 percent below the level of the comparable period last year. "W.T.O. is still the major interest for us, but it takes years to conclude a new round," said Nobuo Tanaka, vice president of the government's Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry. Referring to Japan's sudden surge of interest in bilateral free trade associations, he added, "I can see associations with Korea and Mexico, Canada and Australia." Last month, Japan wrapped up a free trade agreement with Singapore, the first such bilateral agreement for Japan, which is the world's third-largest trading nation, after the United States and Germany. Seeing itself as a Pacific trading hub, Japan is encouraging new bilateral spokes to Mexico, Australia, Canada, Chile, South Korea and Taiwan. Behind the interest is the realization that giant Japanese trade surpluses are as passé as disco music. In the first half of this fiscal year, Japan's trade surplus was down 6.5 percent with the United States, 33.5 percent with Europe and 59.5 percent with Asia. Over the last two years, imports have grown steadily, while exports have stagnated or dropped. Trade surpluses, part of Japan's economic identity since 1965, could disappear in five years. "Back in the 1980's and early 1990's, we were not interested in free trade agreements, but since then, we have started to become surrounded by these groups, in Europe and the United States," said Noboru Hatakeyama, chairman of the Japan External Trade Organization, a government trade promotion agency that favors bilateral pairings. In Doha this weekend, Japan plans to pursue an agenda of keeping farm protection, liberalizing trade in services, standardizing investment rules and restricting antidumping practices. But after the collapse of the 1999 trade meeting in Seattle, Japan has become disenchanted with the slow pace of the 142-member organization. Surrounded by water and lacking in natural resources, Japan has historically been sensitive to its dependence on foreign trade. Many Japanese still believe that the United States and Britain provoked the war in the Pacific when they cut Japan off from Asian sources of oil and rubber in the summer of 1941. Modern Japan imports most of its food and its energy sources, a dependency that was underlined last week when Japan's last coal mine announced that it would close in January. At international trade meetings, Japan has usually taken refuge in multilateralism, joining with Europe to protect domestic farmers with tariff walls. The crowd was a safe place for the Japanese to avoid drawing Japan-bashing attention for protectionist stands. Robert G. Wright, Canada's ambassador to Japan, said, "For 40 years, Japanese were the strongest multilateralists on the block, then they suddenly felt very isolated, with free trade associations all around them." If a liberalization agenda does not emerge from Doha, Canada and many other countries will line up to negotiate bilateral trade agreements with Japan, which is still the world's second-largest economy despite a decade of low growth. "When Japanese authorities look in the direction of Singapore and Mexico, I want them to find Canada on their radar screen," said Pierre S. Pettigrew, Canada's minister of international trade, during a visit here last month. "We should also be thinking about what Japan and Canada could be doing together." Under one timetable, a Japan- Mexico free trade pact would go into effect in two years. Eying a backdoor to the United States, the Toyota Motor Corporation (news/quote) announced last week that it planned to build a manufacturing plant in Mexico by 2003, joining Nissan and Honda there. Australia and Japan have asked a bilateral business panel to deliver a feasibility report six months from now on a free trade association. Taiwan and Japan agreed last month to conduct a similar study for the potential of trade integration. In announcing the joint effort, Taiwan's economic affairs minister, Lin Hsin- yi, noted that among the world's 30 largest economies, Japan, China, Korea and Taiwan are the only ones without free trade agreements. (Japan's agreement with Singapore is to go into effect next April.) "They must be very ambivalent about all this," Michael H. Armacost, president of the Brookings Institution, said last month on a visit to Tokyo, where he was United States ambassador from 1989 to 1993. "When I was here they felt that multilateralism was the best way to go." Spurring Japan to action is the fear that Asia is falling into China's economic orbit, a move that could lock Japan into peripheral isolation. China is urging the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to begin free trade negotiations, Atsushi Yamada, a columnist for Asahi Shimbun, warned last month. "If Japan does not act forcefully to liberalize its markets," he added, "it will likely be left out in the cold." Seeking friends, many Japanese are once again looking across the Pacific to the United States. Some talk of a liberalized trading pact between the two nations, which have the world's largest economies. The big obstacle would be agriculture. Japan maintains high import tariffs and funnels about $4,500 in subsidies into each acre of farmland - far more than Australia, Canada and the United States. The votes of Japanese farmers keep the Liberal Democratic Party in power, and the government shows no interest in liberalizing agricultural imports. "As long as we include goods and agriculture, both Japan and the U.S. will encounter political difficulties," Ryozo Kato, Japan's new ambassador to the United States, said in an interview here late last month. Trade could be promoted, he said, through a different kind of free trade association, "one which sets aside goods and focuses more on the mobility of people, services and investment." But in recent speeches, Robert B. Zoellick, the United States trade representative, has shown little interest in compromise. In one he said that "opening markets for U.S. farmers and ranchers is a top priority in our trade agenda." Bilateral agreements have to be submitted to a World Trade Organization committee for review, largely to make sure that they do not discriminate against other countries. To avoid setting off alarm bells, Japan and Singapore have labeled their new agreement an Economic Agreement for a New Age Partnership. While major food exporters, like Canada and Australia, do not want to drop the issue of Japan's agricultural subsidies unilaterally, their views seem tempered by pragmatism. "About 35 percent of Canada's global trade is in services," said Mr. Wright, the Canadian ambassador. As for working out a deal with Japan, he added, "Before we say it is not doable, let's see what's doable."
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |