< < <
Date Index > > > |
Fiannal Fail and the Mujahideen. by Karl Carlile 30 October 2001 16:06 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
"Pakistan has two reasons to support the so-called mujahideen. First, the Pakistani military is determined to pay India back for allegedly fomenting separatism in what was once East Pakistan and in 1971 became Bangladesh. Second, India dwarfs Pakistan in population, economic strength, and military might. In 1998 India spent about two percent of its $469 billion GDP on defense, including an active armed force of more than 1.1 million personnel. In the same year, Pakistan spent about five percent of its $61 billion GDP on defense, yielding an active armed force only half the size of India's. The U.S. government estimates that India has 400,000 troops in Indian-held Kashmir -- a force more than two-thirds as large as Pakistan's entire active army. The Pakistani government thus supports the irregulars as a relatively cheap way to keep Indian forces tied down." The Fianna Fail Government under Jack Lynch had plans to effect a similar situation. It hoped to fund and train its mujahideen, the right wing Provisional IRA. In that way the Catholic nationalist jihad would have proven to be a relatively cheap device for influencing the course of events within the 6 counties. This state inspired IRA could be used to influence British policy in the north. Yet the Irish government, like the Pakistani government, would have denied all association with IRA activity. Clearly Haughey was the principal architect behind this foreign policy adventure. The arms trial put an end to this policy. The Lynch government hoped, in this way, to exploit the national question as a means of building up its social base thereby guaranteeing its continuation in power. It was also meant as a counterweight to the growing influential Irish civil rights movement. The Provo fundamentalists were meant to undermine the growing social base sustaining the developing civil rights movement which was increasingly radicalising Irish politics. The Fianna Fail policy was designed to replace the growing radicalisation of the civil rights movement with conservative nationalism. In this way it was hoped to polarise the Irish working class into unionist and nationalist communities and thereby destroy the unifying tendencies of the civil rights movement. Had Fianna Fail succeeded in implementing this policy Irihs developments might have had a much different character today. The failure of this policy led to a serious weakening of Fianna Fail that saw its ability to form one party governments much reduced. Its abject failure was ultimately responsible for the split in Fianna Fail. Clearly had this policy been made effective it would have been more consistent with Fianna Fail's character. Its failure to successfully introduce this nationalist policy rendered Fianna Fail no different, in many ways, to Fine Gael. It was this identity problem that led to sustained tension within Fianna Fail and its resulting weakened state. However it is quite likely that if Fianna Fail had controlled the Irish jihad it might have been faced with somewhat similar problems to the ones that now bedevil Pakistan. Despite Fianna Fail ineffectiveness the Provo mujahideen did get off the ground. It did destroy the social base of the civil rights movement replacing it with provincial nationalism. This growing nationalism led to the increased polarisation of the nationalist and unionist working class. The only problem was that Fianna Fail exerted no direct influence over it. Karl Carlile Be free to visit the web site of the Communist Global Group at http://homepage.eircom.net/~beprepared/
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |