< < <
Date Index > > > |
Afghanistan: the larger picture by Louis Proyect 04 October 2001 17:30 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
(posted to the Marxism list by Henry Liu) History does repeat itself, though never with the same specific details. I do not know whether religious fundamentalism is fascist, suffice to say that the President of the US, leading a chrous of mainstream opinion after the attacks of 9:11, 2001, has officially declared it so, at least in its extreme forms. This perspective provides a useful starting point to analize the big picture. In the 1930s, modern fascism in Europe received support from the captains of capitalism who, out of fear that global economic depression would turn the world over to communism, were looking for a surrogate to channel the unrest of the masses into nationalistic construction. German capitalists thought they could control the Nazis, and that Hitler was a man they could do buisness with. Domestic politics in the US also accepted rising fascist tendencies, in political leaders such as Huey Long and others, as a counter force to popular acceptance of communist ideology. The US did not recognize the USSR until 1933 and the League of Nations did not admit the USSR until 1934. The Soviet Union under Stalin, leader of the sole communist power, having been rejected by the European powers to take part in the negotiations leading up to the Munich Pact in 1938, responded with a non-agression pact (August 23, 1939) with Nazi Germany which was turning increasingly hostile to the capitalist West, hoping that a death struggle between state fascism and capitalist democracy built on colonialism would leave a world open to communism. WWII officially began on September 3, 1939 when Britian and France declared war on Germany after German troops invaded Poland two days earlier. But it was a phoney war with no real activities until the Spring of 1940 when German forces overran Danmark, Norway, Luxumberg, the Netherlands and Belgium and pushed the British Expedition Force back to the British Iles from Dunkirk by June 4. German military conquest of Europen was complete with the surrender of France on June 22, 1940. When Germany attacked the USSR on June 22, 1941, a good six month before Pearl Harbor, the right wing in the US cheered. After Pearl Harbor, Germany decalred war on the US. After WWII, the US spent the next five decades fighting communism around the globe through the Cold War. Religious fundamentalism was used by the US as a convenient tool against communism as practised by the USSR in Afganistan. The US also used religious fundamentalism to keep the secular Arabic and Central Asian regimes in line, to keep them from turning left in their domestic politics. Religious fundamentalism was also behind the ethnic separatism that the US supported against Russia and China. What the US did not figure was that religious fundamentalism would identify the US itself as its chief enemy. King Amanullah of Afganistan, proclaiming unilaterally the independence of his country in 1919 without waiting for the reaction of the British, sent out a roving delegation to establish diplomatic relations with the different countries of Asia, Europe, and America. The first stop of that delegation's mission was Moscow, where it was received in October 1919 with open arms by the leaders of the new Soviet government. It was the first diplomatic delegation to visit Moscow since the bolshevik revolution of 1917. So, Afghanistan was the first country to recognise the new "state of workers and peasants of all the Russia". The new regime in Moscow not only recognised the independence of Afghanistan but even "hastened to offer the young state of Afghanistan her moral and material support in her heroic struggle against the British imperialists". This was the beginning of a "special relationship" between the two neighbouring countries which lasted, with ups and downs, for sixty years until the invasion of Afghanistan by the units of the Red Army in December 1979. This was the first geo-political manifestation of an ideological allaince between communism and anti-imperialism. The 20th-century traiangular relationship between capitalism, communism and fascism has parallels with the 21st-century traingular relationship with capitalism, socialism and religious fundamentalism. From 1919-1929 relations between the USSR and Afganistan were very amicable though superficial. The two new governments needed each other. Afghanistan, having broken her century-old traditional bonds with Great Britain, turned towards the Soviet Union for all kinds of support and assistance. In this way, for the first time in the history of relations between these two countries, many Russian technicians and instructors arrived in Afghanistan to set up telephone and telegraph communications, and to train young Afghan technicians, so that the first pilots of the Afghan air force were trained in the Soviet Union. At the same time, Soviet goods came onto the Afghan market which had, up to that time, been monopolised by the British. Anglo-Russian rivalry in Central Asia was century-old geo-politics, though the political ideology assumed a new dimension with the introduction of communism as an anti-imperialist movement. Communist ideology never satisfactorily resolved its contradiction with tribalism which remained the organizing force in Central Asian society. British influence among the Afgan elite remained strong, the notion of class being more comfortable with tribalism. This "flirtation" with the Soviets did not appeal to the British, particularly as anti-colonial and anti-capitalist Bolshevik propaganda made its way slowly across Afghanistan into India. The reaction of Great Britain was brutal. King Amanullah, in his nationalistic, patriotic zeal, had started a series of reforms which were too bold and hurried, modeled along Turkish lines, without taking into consideration conditions peculiar to his own country, or the negative attitude of the religious factions towards these innovations, or their influence on the tribat scoiety. The result was the fall of the reformer monarch and the establishment of a regime which was both conservative and favourable to British policy. The accession of Nader Shah, in 1929, marked the beginning of a new phase in relations between Afghanistan and the Soviet Union. Some referred to this phase as the "closed borders era". In fact, under the reigns of Nader Shah and the early part of Zaher Shah (who was King until the 1973 coup d'etat organised by his cousin Daoud), the relations with the USSR were limited to diplomatic representation and commercial exchanges of no significance. This was the situation until the end of the Second World War, during which time Afghanistan was able to maintain its neutrality because, at least during the last three years of war, its two powerful neighbours were fighting on the same side. In 1947, the political status quo in this area was fundamentally changed by the withdrawal of the British from the Indian sub-continent, an event which left a political vacuum for Afghanistan. The impact was so strong that the conservative government of Prince Hashem, elder uncle of the young King Zaher Shah, and a strong-minded man, who as Prime Minister had ruled the country since the assassination of his older brother, King Nader Shah in 1933 fell, and his brother, Marshal Shah Mahmud, came into power as Prime Minister. In order to fill the geopolitical vacuum, the new government asked the US to take the place vacated by the British, at least in the economic and technical fields, by initiating research works to explore the natural resources of the country, and by building irrigation and communications systems. The Afghan government offered substantial incentives to American commercial firms, in the form of very favourable contracts, in order to develop large areas of so far unproductive land in the Hilmand valley, in the south of the country. The US was not impressed with the political and strategic importance of Afghanistan, and looked on the Afgan intiative as another post war effort to get American aid to develop doubtful resources in a backward country. American interest had much better fish to fry. In 1951, Shah Mahmud personally presented a request to President Truman for the purchase of American arms. The Cold War" was beginning and the American government was developing a strategy to contain the USSR and China. This US strategy drawn up and implemented by Eisenhower and Dulles focused on NATO, CENTO and SEATO, covering the entire zone from Europe to the Far East, in which Pakistan was to play an important part as a link between Central and South East Asia. Since 1947, Pakistan and Afghanistan had a political dispute over the right of self-determination of the Pashtun and Baluch tribes who live along the frontier between the two countries. The Indian government was on the Afghan's side and these two factors led the American government to consider the request for arms as a prelude to a new Kashmir situation in the Area. Faced with the negative response of President Truman, Shah Mahmud made a very significant remark, which was widely commented upon by the press. To a journalist, who had inquired whether the Afghan government would turn to the USSR for arms, he replied: "Muslims are forbidden to eat pork, except when a Muslim is dying of hunger!". Prince Daoud, a cousin of King Zahir, who meanwhile had come to power, tried once more to convince the US of the Afghan government's good will and of its desire to settle the dispute with Pakistan through diplomatic channels. He met Vice-President Nixon during his short visit to Kabul in 1953. But another prerequisite was demanded, namely that Afghanistan should abandon its long tradition of neutrality to join Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, and Turkey as a party to the Baghdad Pact. This was enough to push Prince Daoud, who was already tired of American lack of comprehension into the open arms of Moscow whom the Afgans regard as much more benign. The Great Assembly (Loe Jirga), at a special meeting convened to decide on the Pashtunistan situation and the purchase of arms, unanimously, decided that arms "should be bought wherever this was possible". In Moscow, the new post-Stalin leaders were following these events with great interest. They had started their Peace Policy towards the Third World and were eager to draw Afghanistan into their sphere of influence, in part to isolate China with which the USSR was heading for an open split. In December 1955, Bulganin and Khrushchev stopped in Kabul, on their way back from a trip to India, to assure their new client of the full support of the USSR, not only in terms of arms, but also on the Pashtunistan issue, and a long-term loan of the equivalent of US$100 million was granted to Afghanistan. Numerous Soviet experts started exploring the country; thousands of young Afghans were sent to the USSR to complete their studies in various fields, but mostly to ge military training. Large projects were undertaken by the Russians, mostly in the communication sector and the research of natural resources. Several main roads and airports were built; gas, oil, iron and copper resources were carefully studied. A large polytechnic institute in Kabul and several smaller ones in the provinces were built. During the years 1958 to 1973, 50% of the young officers and army technicians were trained in the USSR, or under the supervision of Russian instructors in Afghanistan. During the whole preparatory and transitional period, the Western powers which, in spite of the growing Russian influence had maintained a presence in Afghanistan, were quite happy at this unprecedented peaceful competition with the USSR. For example, Kabul's airport was built by the Soviets and the technical equipment was supplied by the Americans. A few Afghans, who were familiar with the Russians' methods, and in particular with their way of dealing with the Muslims in Central Asia, voiced some doubts about their impartiality. They were able to convince King Zaher that his cousin was going too far in his relations with the USSR, especially after relations with Pakistan were severed in 1961, making the country totally dependent on the USSR. When signs of Marxist ideas were becoming apparent and were reflected in the press, the King, who was quite slow in making up his mind (this was due to the many years during which all decisions were taken by his uncles and then his cousin), came to a drastic decision. He "accepted the resignation" of Daoud and, for the first time, appointed a Prime Minister who belonged neither to the Royal family, nor to the aristocracy. Dr. Muhammad Yusuf, who was Minister of Mines and Industry in the Daoud government, presented his cabinet, composed of technocrats and intellectuals, in March 1963. He suggested that a new Constitution be prepared with a view to changing the country to a constitutional monarchy. The King agreed to that proposal, and the new constitution was drafted by Afghan experts, in collaboration with foreign legal advisers (a Frenchman, an Indian and an Egyptian). It was based on the principles of classical democracy, but maintained the traditional values, so deeply rooted in Afghan society, of Islam and monarchy. It also excluded all members of the Royal family from the political scene. The Constitution was adopted in October 1964, with only one vote against it, and ratified by the King. General elections were due to take place in October 1965, and, therefore, the interim government had sufficient time to prepare and promulgate by Royal decree the laws for the first democratic general elections. For the first time in the history of Afghanistan, political parties were allowed, on the condition, however, that their aims and activities should conform to the fundamental principles of the Constitution: Islam fundmantalism, constitutional monarchy and individual freedom. Therefore, the formation of leftist parties of any tendency was indirectly excluded. The law on freedom of the press, prepared by the interim government and promulgated by Royal decree, allowed leftist groups to gain strong popular support and overtake all the other political groups. To a large extent, the leftists were helped by conservative pressure groups, who were ready to go to any lengths to retain their power, by using leftist unrest as a excuse to oust the group which had drawn up and defended the new Constitution before the Constituent Assembly. After the first student riots, organized by leftist elements after the opening of the first democratic Parliament, the conservatives suggested that the government should be changed, in spite of the fact that the government had just won a vote of confidence by large majority. Muhammad Hashem Maiwandwal, a former Minister of Information and former Ambassador to Washington, was asked to form a new government. This event was the beginning of the failure of the experiment in democracy in Afghanistan. In was not unique. All over the former colonial Third World, democracy was aborted to stop countries from turning left. The workers started to get organised and became very active in the industrial areas of the country; the demonstrations, which had begun on the campus of the University and in the secondary schools of Kabul, soon spread to the provinces: riots became more and more frequent; the King was openly criticized. An agreement was reached in 1971 between two officers belonging to the "Parcham" group and Dr. Hassan Sharq who was acting on Daoud's behalf. Prince Daoud was to lead an army coup which had been prepared by the Parchami officers in Kabul and under the direct supervision of Soviet military advisers. The opportunity came when the King traveled to Europe for a medical check-up. The Heir Apparent, Ahmad Shah, was to replace the King; the government was led by Muhammad Musa Shafiq, an intelligent young intellectual but without experience, and General Abdul Wali, a cousin and son-in-law of the King, who was the commanding officer of the armed forces in Kabul. On 18 July 1973, Daoud made a radio announcement, informing the Afghan people that the monarchy had come to an end and that a Republic was being set up. The 1964 democratic Constitution was annulled; a temporary government and a revolutionary council - both headed by Daoud - came into power. Six members of the "Parcham" group were in the government, and half of the members of the revolutionary council were Parchami officers. The programme of the new government promised a fast and revolutionary development of the country, based on democracy and socialism. This programme was practically identical to the one published in the first issue of the Parcham newspaper, four years earlier, especially with regard to land reform, nationalisation of banks, large industries and social justice, etc. Daoud was not a communist, nor was he a man to accept orders from anyone, especially foreigners. It may be that he believed he could get rid of his demanding allies. At any rate, he tried to keep them to one side as he strengthened his own position. Two years later, all the leftist ministers were replaced. Some were sent abroad as ambassadors, some simply asked to resign. Moscow did not react immediately. Daoud had a new Constitution drawn up, providing for one party only, on the model of Algeria and Egypt (during Naser's time). Once more the Soviets tried to reason with Daoud; he was invited to Moscow, but would not yield on this point which, for him, would have meant total surrender. After this eventful meeting, the Russian leaders decided that Daoud should be removed from power, and the first condition to achieve this was the reconciliation of the two leftist groups Parcham and Khalk. After eight years of antagonism, the two groups united to become the "People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan", under the leadership of Nur Muhammad Taraki, the Khalk leader, who was to become President of Afghanistan. Babrak Karmal, the Parcham leader, would only be Vice-President, and later, for a few months, Ambassador in Prague. After his visit to Moscow, Daoud became worried about his own safety, and was ready, but too late, to follow the advice of other political leaders. The machine of the KGB was already moving in his direction. The new Constitution was accepted by the Constituent Assembly and he was elected, in March 1977, as President of the Republic for a term of six years. Daoud knew, however, that he could no longer count on either Moscow's support, or the loyalty of the officers who had brought him into power four years earlier. He had become unpopular with the military and fundamentalists after his open "flirtation" with Moscow and his incredible tolerance towards the leftist groups which had monopolised the political scene of the country. His only chance was to turn to the Muslim countries, at least to obtain financial and moral support in case of total break-up with Moscow. His trips to Kuwait, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, in March and April 1978, and the reconciliation with the Shah of Iran, were desperate efforts which only precipitated his fall. Daoud did not have time to leave the presidential palace, where he, his whole family, and his aids were killed, without even being able to call on the half-a-dozen army camps which he had set up around the capital for such an event. Mir Akbar Khaiber, the theoretician of the party, who had opposed the total take-over by the Soviets was murdered on 18 April 1978, and his funeral provided the opportunity for the members and sympathisers of the leftist parties to launch the protests and riots which were to last for several days. All the communist leaders were arrested, and the open confrontation started. The winner was the Popular United Khalk party, and the first pro-Soviet government was thus established in Afghanistan. Many have suggested Afghanistan as one of the factors in the demise of the USSR. The effects of the Afghan War in the Soviet Union's domestic dynamics and relate public opinion/opposition to the war, during and after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in December 1979. Entering late in the Europeanization process (sixteenth century), Russia adopted the finished product and thus had to deconstruct the progress while playing catch-up. The defeat of Peter the Great in 1700 by the Swedish King, Charles XII, focused Peter's mind on domestic shortcomings. The Petrine reforms that followed covered about all aspects of Russian life. Peter's forceful, ruthless, and willful attitudes dragged the country toward progress. In 1712 Peter decisively defeated Charles; and by the end of his reign, some argue, that Russia won the fear, if not respect, of Europe- especially militarily. Catherine the Great (1762-96) brought Russia closer to the European frame of mind. Under Alexander I (1801-25) Russia's skillful army defeated Napoleon in 1814. And its here when a group of officers known as Decemberists staged an unsuccessful coup against the state government. The Third Department [a direct ancestor of the KGB] of Nicholas I (1825-55) was established to stamp out nonconformity in Russia. Moreover, this reactionary regime rested in Slavophilism philosophy, which basically inherited the ideology that Russia had no need to borrow from the West in order to make herself known to the world - as had argued the Decemberists. Thus, the Tsar preached that Russia was uniquely capable of an orderly, benevolent despotism rooted in the Orthodox church. This ideology, however, was bypassed by Alexander II (1855-81) after the death of Nicholas I, who freed the 43 million serfs. Alexander also released the surviving Decemberists and eased censorship but refused to relinquish absolute power or grant a constitution to Russia. It is under him that the prestige of Russian military superiority comes to an end in 1854, when an Anglo-French army successively defeated the Russian army. Wanting an easy and low cost victory to improve its military image, Nicholas II turned to Asia and attacked Japan in 1904. Suffering a disastrous defeat, Nicholas faced waves of strikes which paralyzed the economy. As a result a consultative parliament, the Duma, was established in May 1906. The new Prime Minister, Pyotr Stolypin, dissolved the first Duma, and enforced great reforms - but was finally killed in 1911 for being more effective then the Tsar, while disappointing the left and the right wings with his reform policies. Never the less, in October 1917, after an embarrassing defeat in World War I, the last of the Romanov dynasty, Tsar Nicholas II, was executed by the victorious Communists. The contradiction between limited economic reform (which plagued Lenin, who reluctantly allowed a semi-Capitalism to revive the devastated economy) and continued revolutionary a solutism came to an end with the Stalin's launching of his twin drives of industrialization and collectivization, which saw the total defeat of limited economic reform. Needless to say that the World War II victory also contributed to this formula greatly. All vicarious war lead to a strengthening of totalitarianism in the country, and all unsuccessful ones have led to democracy. Ironically, when the Soviet forces were compelled to withdraw from Afghanistan (April 15, 1989), the Soviet Union was beginning to undergo the initial stages of drastic reforms from above since the reign of Alexander II. At the eve of Russian invasion of Afghanistan, the rotting effects of revisionism and autocratic power on the national psychology had resulted in corruption, collpase of discipline, responsibility and accountability which fanned grassroots apathy, the same problems which had plagued Peter the Great's administration before the Swedish War in 1700. And much like Catherine the Great's Nakaz and the Potemkin villages, a glossy blanket of false propaganda had covered the domestic degeneration. To make further parallels, as Nicholas II, who made the mistake of attacking the seemingly "weaker" opponent (Japan), Brezhnev invaded the "easy" Afghanistan, totally ignoring local history and traditional patterns. In the same light, Gorbachev, like Tsar Alexander, sought to preserve and even to increase his personal power and to maintain the organs of suppression which were so carefully nurtured by his predecessors. But his position was challenged by the old school hard lined conspirators in the 1991 failed coup, and was finally removed from power shortly after by Boris Yeltsin, a man who sought his ideology from the bottle and introduced gangster capitalism to Russia. On the other hand, Afghanistan became a unified country in 1747 under the leadership of an ethnic Pashtun leader, Ahmad Khan of the Sadozai (later named Durrani) clan of the Abdali tribe. It is under this tribe that the leadership of Afghanistan rested until the 1978 'revolution'. In the meantime, the expansion of Russia southward by early to mid nineteenth century posed a threat to the jewel of the British crown, India. The British predicted that Peter the Great's dream of expansion could endanger their possessions in India, thus adopted an anti-expansionist policy (against Russia) which made Turkey, Iran, Afghanistan, and Tibet a fence around any further Russian expansion; and thus began "the Great Game". In 1839, the British invaded Afghanistan and occupied the capital, Kabul. In January 1842, out of 16,500 soldiers (and 12,000 dependents) only one survivor, of mixed British-Indian garrison, reaching the fort in Jalalabad, on a stumbling pony. Fearing another Russian influence, the British once again entered Afghanistan in 1878. In July 1880 the regiment was cut to ribbons, while 'Abd al-Rahman Khan became Amir of Afghanistan, but agreed to surrender Afghan foreign relations to the British. In 1919 (Third and last Anglo-Afghan War), under Amanullah Khan, Afghanistan reclaimed its foreign independence from the British, who were never to interfere directly into Afghan affairs again. A lot of people accuse the Afgans of all kinds of shortcoming, but none has faulted them for being poor warriors. The question over the motive of the Soviet Union in Afghanistan may be raised. Different authors have put forward a long list of issues which may have enticed the Russian invasion, but they all agree that: both countries had long and close relationship with one another; and the government of Afghanistan was one of the first to recognized the Bolshevik regime. Afghanistan had the largest per capita economic aid program with the Soviet Union before the Communist coup; the Afghan military was trained in the Soviet Union, and finally because the U.S. didn't supply military equipment to the government of Afghanistan during Prime Minister (1953-63) and later President (1973-78) Mohammad Daoud's office. The notion of self identify and nationalism which had popular appeal in the Middle East since the nineteenth century, reached Afghanistan in 1960's and created popular dynamics resulting in the evolution of the leftist and rightists parties. In 1964 a liberal constitution initiated by King Zahir, permitted multi-party elections in the Parliament and other government offices in Afghanistan. Moscow supported an Afghan Communist party. Thus the People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA) was established in January 1965 by a group of intellectuals. Meanwhile, Conservative Islamist opposition was formed during the 1960's when the Pakistani Jama'at-i Islami, headed by 'Abdul 'Ala Maududi, tried to establish a sister organization in Kabul, with the help of some theology professors (graduates of Al-Azhar University, Egypt) at the Theology Department of the University of Kabul, aiming to revive the ideals of Moslem Brethren. During the Soviet occupation and the civil war that followed, these leaders emerged as the major players on the Afghan scene. The PDPA split into Khalq [People] and Parcham [Banner] factions, but were reunited under close Soviet patronage in 1977. President Daoud tried to eliminate the PDPA in Spring 1978 by arresting its leaders. This action triggered a classic Coup d'etat the next day. An armored brigade took over the presidential palace and killed everyone inside. Three days later the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan was declared, and Nur Mohammad Taraki announced as the president. Although it is argued that Moscow did not directly trigger the coup, one can point out that it did nothing to prevent it either. Thus, the internal dynamics of the PDPA may have outpaced Soviet strategy. Regardless, the damage had been done. The neighboring countries were not however greatly alarmed by the PDPAs take-over, because the regional balance of power still had not changed. Only Pakistan was worried about a stronger and tougher Kabul and thus supported the anti-government elements. The West, also, did not yet see the 1978 coup as a expansion of the Soviets toward the warm waters. Hafizullah Amin's bodyguards assassinated President Taraki in September 1979 and he began a ruthless subjugation of the opposition which consisted of two-third of the country. Shaken by peasant revolts, urban upheavals and bloody internal feuds, the regime was on the verge of collapse when in December 27, 1979 the Soviets decided to intervene, killing Amin and replacing him with Babrak Karmal. After Karmal's failure to bring peace to the country, he was replaced by Dr. Najibullah in May 1986. He was to remain president until the Mujahidin coalition took power in 1992. In establishing the parameters, one could not put a price on the casualties, however it is necessary to apply some numerical figures into it. In fighting the Soviets the Afghans suffered about two million dead (mostly civilian), an economic devastation, over five million displaced citizens, and such political and social disintegration that the very future survival of Afghanistan as a state is still questionable. The war, for the Soviets without much exaggeration, meant nothing less then national suicide, even if one counts Afghanistan as a catalyst for the breakup process of the Soviet Union. Economically speaking, the cost of the war varies, according to the varying Soviet figures, but the figure is given as $8.2 billion per year. As for casualties, the official 15,000 dead is a gross underestimation. Experts agree that at least 40,000 - 50,000 Soviets lost their lives in action, besides the wounded, suicides, and murders. The ultimate political cost, however, was at least the breakup of the surface glaze which had hidden much of the internal decay for decades. This, in part, would not have been possible without the great contributions of communicational technology which became at the disposal of the populace [mostly after the Afghan War, i.e. fax machines and the free and uncensored Media (due to Glastnos)], all of which were capable of reporting the slightest news around the world and all over the USSR. For more than twenty years, war has consumed Afghanistan. In 1979, the Soviet Union launched an invasion of the country in order to prop up a pro-communist regime in Kabul. The United States and Pakistan played leading roles backing various Afghan guerrilla forces, known collectively as "mujahideen" (religious warriors), which gradually wore down the Soviet occupying force. Afghanistan's civil war continued after a Soviet pullout in 1989 as various mujahideen factions fought to fill the power vacuum. In the past four years, a newer group called the Taliban has gained control of most of Afghanistan. The Taliban, whose name means "students," have their roots in the Pakistan-based seminaries established for Afghan refugees during the Soviet occupation. The movement got a significant boost from the Pakistani intelligence agency, ISI, which reportedly provided extensive organizational, logistical, and material support to the Taliban militia. The core of the Taliban are from the Pashtun ethnic group, the largest single group in Afghanistan but still a minority of the population. Pashtuns are also a significant ethnic group in Pakistan, where they are heavily represented in the military. The Taliban captured the Afghan capital, Kabul, in 1996, and now reportedly control all but the Panjshir Valley and other smaller areas in northern Afghanistan. They have imposed a highly restrictive form of Islamic law throughout Afghanistan which Muslim and non-Muslim observers have described as inhumane. Some see the Taliban's efforts to be not so much Islamic as an attempt to impose rural tribal mores onto the rest of the country. International concern is mounting about the treatment of Afghan women, who are usually denied schooling, medical care, and freedom to travel except under strict conditions. There have also been widespread reports of extrajudicial killings throughout Afghanistan as well as reports of massacres as the Taliban conquered new territory. The Taliban reportedly support their regime partly from profits in the opium trade. The Taliban directly tax domestic growers as well as traders who traffic in the narcotics. Sharp increases in Afghan production have left Afghanistan lagging behind only Burma as the world's largest producer of opium products in the world, amounting to 2,800 metric tons in 1997. The two countries combined account for 90 percent of opium production worldwide. The Taliban have further angered the international community by sheltering Saudi-born terrorist Osama bin Laden, who was linked by the U.S. government to the bombings of two U.S. embassies in Africa in August 1998. Later in the same month, U.S. cruise missiles attacked training sites in Afghanistan associated with bin Laden. The Taliban insist that bin Laden had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks that killed more than 300 people and wounded another 5,000, but they have only belatedly indicated a willingness to help clarify his possible role. The Afghan conflict may escalate into a regional one. Currently, more than 200,000 Iranian troops are amassed along the Iranian-Afghan border in response to the killing of a journalist and eight people Iran says were diplomats and the Taliban contend were military advisors. Relations with other international actors are strained or nonexistent. International human rights groups and aid missions have withdrawn from the country because of the harassment and killing of aid workers. Despite the fact that the Taliban control at least 90 percent of the territory of Afghanistan, only Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates recognize the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan, and those relations are fraying. Decades of foreign intervention have devastated Afghanistan, laying waste to more than 75 percent of the country. From 1978 until 1996, foreign intervention sharpened internal ethnic and ideological differences, tearing the country apart. During this time, Russia, Iran, the United States, and other countries ignored ethnically motivated massacres, rapes, and human rights abuses. The recent international focus on the social conditions in Afghanistan can be attributed to economic interests, and especially access to the potentially vast energy resources in the Caspian Basin region. Afghans of all ethnicities welcome the Taliban as heroes who have restored peace to Afghanistan. Except for US missile attacks, most of the country has been peaceful and disarmed, trade routes to Central Asia are beginning to prosper, the value of the currency has increased, and agriculture has improved. The Taliban are also effectively governing Afghanistan. They have secured all borders except a small portion of the border with Tajikistan, and control all major points of entry. The Taliban's government claims it is accountable to the people and is representative of all ethnic groups. The majority of the government's cabinet members are from ethnic minorities, for example. The Taliban have restored Afghan culture, Afghan-style self-rule is implemented in the provinces, and the civil administration and justice system is based on Islamic and Afghan traditions. President Reagan was one of its enthusiastic supporters. Regarding terrorism, it was the former president, Burhanuddin Rabbani, who invited Osama bin Laden to Afghanistan. The Taliban inherited this problem, and would cooperate with bin Laden's extradition if the U.S. government or other interested parties could show evidence of his terrorist activities. The missile attacked launched by Clinton in August 1998 to kill bin Laden was ineffective. If the US sends troops into Afganistan and sustains a lengthly occupation, the war on terrorism will quickly turn into a regional conflict of unpredictable complexity. Henry C.K. Liu Louis Proyect Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |