< < <
Date Index > > > |
Muslim fundamentalism by Karl Carlile 21 September 2001 17:55 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
Many Muslims have been declaring that all Muslims must obey the declaration of a holy war by the Taliban mullahs. This view that emanates from many Muslims flies in the face of the facts. Muslims have over the years violently attacked each other. In Afghanistan the Northern Alliance consists of Muslims. Yet they have been engaged in combat with the Muslim Taliban. The current Musharrif military dictatorship in Pakistan violently ousted a democratically elected leader of Pakistan. Saddam Hussein, leader of Iraq, has imprisoned and killed many a Muslim. The Iranian theocracy has been responsible for the deaths of many a Muslim. The last King of Jordan engaged in a massive attack on the Black September in Jordan. The Syrian regime have been responsible for similar killings. The degree to which Muslims internationally will obey the declaration of a holy war is questionable. Fundamentalism is not as strong as it is often portrayed. It can suit both sides to engage in hyperbole to promote the particular political interests that each respectively represent. The Taliban is a reactionary regime that is bitterly hostile to communism. The entire programme of the Taliban is the active hindering of the economic and political development of Afghanistan. In any anti imperialist war movement we cannot take either the side of the US led imperialist coalition nor the Muslim organisations or states that may be subject to attack from this reactionary coalition. We must mount a popular attack on this prospective imperialist war on the basis of an attack on the capitalist state. Such a movement must challenge the very existence of capitalism and the forces that support it such as the Taliban, the Iranian state and, above all, the imperialist states. Indeed Muslim fundamentalism is capitalism's saviour. Its ideological and political function is designed to prevent the masses from turning towards communism. In Iran where a revolutionary situation emerged the Muslim movement led by Khomeni was the form assumed by the counter revolution. It prevented the Iranian working class from deepening the revolutionary process and thereby challenging capitalism. The Afghanistanian mujahideen was sustained by imperialism through the CIA and the Pakistani state in the struggle to preserve and develop the class interests of imperialist capital. Islamic fundamentalism is not as strong as it has been presented even by its apparent enemies. There has been much hyperbole in this regard. If it posed a threat to the stability and development of capitalism it would not be compelled to resort to terrorism. The current condition of the Palestinians is irrefutable evidence as to the weakness of Islamic fundamentalism. Islamic fundamentalism in the Middle East has shown its complete political bankruptcy. Instead of the situation improving as a result of its growing influence the situation has been deteriorating. This is because its strategy is incapable of solving the problems of the Palestinian masses. Its sectarianism has generated division and further polarised Jew from Arab. The problems of the Palestinian masses can be only solved when Jewish and Arab worker join hands against Middle East capitalism and its states --the Israeli, Jordanian, Syrian and Egyptian states. There is no essential difference between the Israeli and Jordanian state. All such states ultimately exist to perpetuate the class interests of imperialist capital. All must be abolished. An attack on the Middle East capitalist states is an attack on imperialist capitalism. Muslim fundamentalism, and Islam in general, is a sectarian religious ideology and even political philosophy and practice. It essentially promotes the class interests of imperialism. Muslim and Christian fundamentalism are particularly sectarian. Muslim fundamentalism has been effectively promoting polarization between Eastern and Western workers at a time when the globalisation of the working class into a unified political reality is an urgent necessity. While attacking racism it sustains racism a multiplicity of ways because it is inherently racist. The conflict now developing between US state and Islam fundamentalism has its source in the needs of US imperialism. US imperialism to survive must relentlessly extend and deepen its influence economically, politically and ideologically. The developing global economic crisis is testimony to this. Consequently it must engage in specific geopolitical actions in pursuance of this aim. It cannot tolerate relatively autonomous, albeit contradictory, forces that hinder it in its desperate effort to extend and deepen its influence. Muslim fundamentalism is, largely speaking, one such force. Its destabilising character in the current situation outweighs its benefits for imperialism. It is a destabilising force in Asia and the Middle East. Regimes that American imperialism has needed are threatened with destabilisation and even collapse by Muslim fundamentalism. Iran is a classic example where Muslim fundamentalism led to the collapse of an actively pro-imperialist regime that was the lynchpin of US geo political regional strategy. However imperialism is a contradictory force which means that it engages in policies and actions that lead to its own undermining. Although the function of Muslim fundamentalism, as a counter revolutionary force, is the prevention of the development of the working class into a communist working class it is these unique characteristics that, in the immediate sense, obstruct imperialist expansion. Consequently imperialism's relationship to fundamentalism has a contradictory character. It uses it in pursuance of its class interests while simultaneously undermining it. In the same way Muslim fundamentalism is contradictory. While actively sustained by imperialism it at the same time attacks imperialism its very source of nourishment. Bin Laden personifies this contradictory relation. While sustained by the CIA in his struggle in Afghanistan he turns his guns on it. In many ways Muslim fundamentalism is similar to Stalinism. Stalinism is a counter revolutionary force that prevents the existence of communism. Consequently it serves imperialism's interests. Yet to maintain its unique role as a counter revolutionary form it has acted, at the same time, in a way that obstructs imperialism. This generates conflict between the two forces. The Cold War was just such a conflict. Muslim fundamentalism is a religious and political ideology and practice that is petty bourgeois. It serves the class interests of small capital. It is this that makes it reactionary. However the very fact that it serves the interests of small capital in the context of increasing capitalist globalisation is what lends it its acutely anachronistic image in the eyes of the Western working class. However it is its specific class character that gives it its appeal to the masses that exist outside of western capitalist society. Its representation of the interests of small capital means that it expresses a hostility to big capital. And what bigger capital than US imperialist capital --the Great Satan. It is this hostility by small capital against big capital that gives its anti-imperialist appearance. It is this anti-imperialist appearance that lends its anti-oppressive appearance. Consequently the Muslim masses identify with it. Despite its anti-imperialist appearance it ultimately serves imperialism class interests --essentially it cannot exist independently of global capitalism. Muslim fundamentalism is a politics of the image. This is why it presents itself as quixotic pageantry -- religious rhetoric, images, long beards etc. This form of politics assumes a religious form because it is a politics of appearance. And what more suitable a form for such a contradictory politics than its disguising itself in religious --the class image system. Given the political character of Muslim fundamentalism there is no possibility that it can successfully resist the enormous power of capitalist imperialism bearing down on it in the form of this Washington led coalition of "Infinite Justice". Only the modern working class can effectively challenge the might of the imperialist bourgeoisie. Note: Forgive the unpolished character of this posting since it was written in a hasty manner because of the pressure of time and the fast pace of developments. Regards Karl Carlile(Global Communist Group) Be free to join our communism mailing list at http://homepage.eircom.net/~kampf/
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |