< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: Chomsky by Paul Gomberg 14 September 2001 19:55 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
I believe Richard is to be commended for speaking out and for reminding the rest of us that it is possible to do this even in a difficult time. I will try to do as well. Paul Richard N Hutchinson wrote: > On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, David Wolsk wrote: > > > I feel it's important to develop widespread global support for an > > alternative to "war" against the perpetrators: e.g., an ultimatum to > > Afganistan: turn over Bin Laden for trial before the Hague world court, or > > face the consequences. > > What's your alternative? An ultimatum implies an "or else," so you > end up with war anyway since I'm sure Bin Laden is not waiting around in > Afhghanistan for the U.S. troops. > > *** *** *** *** *** > > The NY slogans are good: Islam is Not the Enemy, War is Not the Solution. > (Work for peace and justice is less good, though correct.) > > I just finished speaking out against the impending war for the first time > here in conservative Utah, both in my classes and in a campus-wide open > forum, and I feel like it was an important contribution. > > Whatever your personal beliefs, pragmatically speaking I think one of the > best approaches in a largely Christian society is to contrast the Old > Testament "eye for an eye" doctrine to the New Testament's "do unto > others" and "love your neighbor." Beyond that, pointing out the futility > of military attacks or war as a solution to the problem of terrorist > networks did not meet any serious logical counterarguments. > > My colleagues seem hesitant, with good reason, but I am still planning on > holding an educational event soon on the background of the recent tragedy, > ie a history of U.S. policy in the Middle East/SW Asia, who trained Osama > bin Laden, the nature of Islam, and so forth. > > RH >
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |