< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: your views on globalization by Krishnendu Ray 10 April 2001 19:23 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
Why the comparison between "Portugal" and "McDonalds"? Portugal does not make wine, Portuguese vitners make wine. Who may sell it to the British to make a profit. If that is comparative advantage then isn't Macdonald's raising cattle in Guatemala comparable? The difference of course is that in the latter case some of the profit goes to US stock holders, while Portuguese vitners may or may not have US stock holders. Some of the profit stays in the Guatemala as income for intermediaries (lease payment), and of course wages, etc. But usually that would be a smaller proportion than that accruing to "core-like" nodes of the commodity chain. I don't see an analytical difference between the two scenarios other than quantitative difference. Is this where quantity leads to qualitative difference? Is that the point being made? Krishnendu Ray >>> "Richard K. Moore" <richard@cyberjournal.org> 04/10/01 11:26AM >>> 4/10/2001, Paul Riesz wrote: > Though the promoters of globalization might pursue many different goals, their BASIC one is still the opening up of economies to foreign trade and any resulting benefits can only come from making use of comparative advantages. If Portugal can make wine more efficiently than Britain, and if Portugal exports wine, accruing a profit to the Portuguese economy, then ~that~ is what 'comparative advantage' is about. If MacDonalds leases land in Guatemala, raises cattle there, and is able to sell cheaper hamburgers in Detroit, the benefit goes not to Guatemala but to MacDonalds. This is what globalization is about, what is intended to be about, and it has nothing to do with the principle of comparative advantage. > My proposals are not intended for a different world, but could - and might - have a reasonable chance of being adopted in the not too distant future. What makes you think they have any reasonable chance? They would amount to a frontal assault on the whole capitalist system. sorry, rkm http://cyberjournal.org
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |