< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: role of Third.. Ayatollah/CIA ? by Institute for Global Futures Research (IGFR) 02 January 2001 17:45 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
At 02:24 PM 12/31/2000 +0000, you wrote: >The shifts in the relationship with the periphery are best >described by Huntington, in 'Clash of Civilizations', and >are exemplified by the US installation of the Ayatollah in >Iran. Instead of the pretense of 'universal democratization' >rkm Did I miss something ? Can one really argue that the Ayatollah was installed in Iran by the US - given the US/UK support of the Shah, the US hostage crisis etc ? We know about the Iran-Contra deal, and the way Carter was brought down by the hostage crisis. But surely this was some ad hoc opportunism by the CIA and Co. The Ayatollah was installed by an Islamic revolution which was a response by Islamic Civilisation to their domination by Western secular society (libertarian, individualist, materialist, roots in Christian/Protestant Civilisation). Perhaps we need to acknowledge the major (slow-motion) clash between Islam and Christianity first (paradigmatic), then the political-economic systems clashes layered on top (strategic). The Iran-Contra saga was no more than theatre. Regards, Geoff Holland
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |