Louis Proyect is correct

Louis Proyect's critique of my comments  (see below)  is entirely correct. I
was trying to be sarcastic and understated with the use of terms like "I
guess" and then pointing out the bizzare, semi-paranoid analysis of that
group  (ancient Rome to Queen Victoria?).  But Louis Proyect's more direct
comments are accurate, much clearer and to the point.

Alan Spector

==================================================



----- Original Message -----
From: "Louis Proyect" <lnp3@panix.com>
To: <wsn@csf.colorado.edu>
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: Genocide


> At 05:34 PM 11/24/00 -0600, Alan Spector wrote:
> >The e-mail address: eirns@larouchepub.com; makes me think that perhaps
the
> >book is sponsored by whatever groups Lyndon Larouche is operating these
> >days. I don't want to get into " group-baiting"; a book can have some
> >accurate information no matter who sponsors it.
>

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Alan, this is not a sensible approach. It is not a matter of
> "group-baiting". Larouche has a well-documented record of collaborating
> with Klansmen and other ultrarightists. This is not the kind of outfit
that
> deserves a hearing on this kind of mailing list. We should treat it the
> same as an announcement from Holocaust revisionists or other
crypto-fascists.
>
> Louis Proyect
> Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org/
>