< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
A Humane Response
by alexy2k gerard
30 March 2000 03:35 UTC
Africa News, March 29, 2000
SECTION: NEWS, DOCUMENTS & COMMENTARY LENGTH: 799 words
HEADLINE: ;
Eritrea;
;
A Humane Response;
BODY:
Asmara - "Despite what they have done to us, we have maintained our
humanity."
This is how an Eritrean friend responded to the news that Eritrea had
agreed
in principle to a US proposal to bring food aid to Ethiopia through the
Eritrean port of Assab. Indeed, only a people who have maintained their
humanity can put aside for a moment their own immediate suffering and
entertain the proposal of a "humanitarian corridor" to save the lives of 8
million people whose leaders have other more "important" things to do:
invade neighboring countries, "annihilate" Eritrea, deport their own people.
In agreeing to the US proposal to use Assab, the Eritrean government said
it
was doing so because of "its moral obligation to assist in the
international
relief efforts to prevent a human catastrophe." This is not the first time
that Eritrea has held fast to its principles in the face of constant
provocations from Ethiopia. To every inhuman act that the Ethiopian regime
has committed since the simmering border conflict between the two countries
erupted into war almost two years ago, Eritrea's response has been that of
respect to the rule of law and the human dignity of the person.
When Ethiopia officially declared war on Eritrea in 1998, Eritrea responded
with a statement affirming the importance of finding a peaceful resolution
to the conflict. Eritrea called for face-to-face talks with Ethiopia and
for
unconditional ceasefire.
Again, early in the conflict, Eritrea released a number of Ethiopian
prisoners of war at a time when Ethiopian media was boasting about the
number of Eritreans captured or killed.
There was no celebration when thousands of Ethiopians perished attempting
to
break the Tserona front and Eritrea successfully foiled another Ethiopian
attempt to march into Asmara. Eritreans gave a huge sigh of relief and
expressed sadness that so many Ethiopians would perish for a conflict that
could be solved peacefully. Unlike in Ethiopia, there was no perverse joy
in
the death of Ethiopians.
To Ethiopia's cruel, inhuman and illegal deportation of Eritreans legally
residing in the country as well of its own citizens of Eritrean origin,
Eritrea responded with a public declaration to protect the rights of
Ethiopians residing in Eritrea.
Even as Ethiopia rounded up Eritrean students studying in Ethiopia through
a
University exchange program between the two countries and sent them to
malaria infested internment camps in the south of the country, Eritrea
allowed Ethiopian exchange students studying at Asmara university to finish
their exams and return home by plane with safety and dignity.
Whereas Ethiopia refused International Red Cross request to arrange air
transport for the sick and elderly Eritreans it wanted to deport and
instead
dumped them in the middle of the night at heavily mined border crossings
between the two countries, Eritrea was able to facilitate air transport for
Ethiopian exchange students wanting to go home. This it was able to do
despite Ethiopia's (then) short lived, illegal air and sea embargo against
Eritrea during which it threatened to shoot at anything that moved.
Once again, Eritrean people have demonstrated their humanity through their
willingness to have the international community use Assab to deliver relief
aid to Ethiopia, even though it is Ethiopia that boycotted Eritrean ports
in
the first place.
Even so, Eritrea's largesse cannot be at the expense of its security and
the
safety of its own people. Ethiopia must first exhaust the capacity of other
ports (in neighboring Djibouti, Kenya, Somalia) to import emergency food
aid. Ethiopia cannot be allowed to continue importing military equipment
through Djibouti while using Eritrean ports for relief supplies.
Ethiopia should declare where its priorities lie. It should formally
declare
that it will cease bombing Eritrean ports and civilian targets. It should
agree to unconditional ceasefire and focus on its obligation to feed its
own
people.
The US has called for more aid for Ethiopia. "The United States cannot meet
our obligations worldwide and completely cover this drought-damage
situation. I want to urge our European friends to move quickly, " reported
Reuters quoting Hugh Parmer of the U.S. Agency for International
Development
(USAID). The US is missing the first step. The primary obligation of
feeding
Ethiopians rests with the Ethiopian government. The international community
first needs to call on Ethiopia to redirect its war energy into feeding its
people. No amount of generosity from the international community, including
Eritrea, can make up for the missing factor in the race to save lives: that
of Ethiopia redirecting its One million US dollars a day war expenditure
towards the relief effort underway.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
|
Home