< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
Re: gender
by Kristin L. Marsh
18 March 2000 22:22 UTC
Not quite. Gender refers to "feminine" vs. "masculine" behaviors,
roles, preferences, etc., that are associated with sex only as a social
construct: that is, we impose these associations. Gender roles do not
naturally develop from sex differences. And I would adamantly disagree
with you re: sex differences. These are also socially constructed to
the extent that the dichotomous categorization of sex into either
all-female or all-male is, likewise, socially imposed.
West, Candace and Don H.Zimmerman. 1987. "Doing Gender." Gender and
Society, 1, 2: 125-51.
Coventry, Martha. "The Tyranny of the Esthetic: Surgery's Most Intimate
Violation." Pp. 183-191 in Disch, ed., Reconstructing Gender.
Lucal, Betsy. 1999. "What it Means to be Gendered Me: Life on the
Boundaries of a Dichotomous Gender System." Gender and Society. 13, 6,
pp. 781-797.
********************
Kristin Marsh
Department of Sociology
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia 30322
Richard N Hutchinson wrote:
>
> Mine-
>
> I think I agree with what you're saying about gender (I'm no expert) with
> one exception:
>
> > Regarding your last question, let me reiterate that gender is a social
> > construct. There are two biological sexes or variations between the two.
>
> OK, so far so good. (No Derridean "failure to communicate.")
>
> >
> > What I know is that gender has nothing to do with the biological basis
>of
> > sex differences.
>
> This is where I lose you. If you mean that the sex differences do not
> *determine any particular gender*, then fine, of course. (Logically
> there are but 2 sexes, and an infinite number of possible genders.) But
> gender, I thought, was precisely about how social roles are defined for
> people according to their sex. Nothing complicated or sinister here, just
> a simple definition. If the role is not defined in relation to sex, then
> it could be wage laborer, or episcopalian, or something else, but we
> wouldn't call it gender. Right? So gender in that simple way has
> everything to do with biological sex difference.
>
> Richard
< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
|
Home